Ghana’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, has firmly rejected recent reports alleging that Ghana would accept Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national at the center of a heated U.S. deportation controversy. Addressing what he described as “widespread misinformation,” Mr. Ablakwa clarified that Ghana is not considering, nor has it agreed to, accept Abrego Garcia, whose case has attracted international media coverage and ignited discussions on immigration policies across West Africa and beyond.
Mr. Ablakwa emphasized that any arrangement between Ghana and the United States strictly limits the country’s acceptance of non-criminal West Africans—only on a humanitarian basis and in narrowly defined circumstances. No provision exists for receiving deportees outside this group, and the minister underscored that this understanding has not changed or been expanded.
This clarification came after several international news outlets claimed that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had informed Abrego Garcia’s legal team of plans to deport him to Ghana. The confusion reportedly stemmed from a notice sent by U.S. immigration authorities, which was later described by the DHS as “premature” and subsequently withdrawn.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia at a rally outside the Baltimore Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office, August 25, 2025. (Stephanie Scarbrough/AP)
On Thursday, October 10, Mr. Ablakwa took to social media to categorically state Ghana’s official position. Reaching out directly to both the Ghanaian public and the international community, he reiterated, “Ghana has made it clear in all our communications that this individual will not be accepted.”
Ghana is not accepting Abrego Garcia. He cannot be deported to Ghana. This has been directly and unambiguously conveyed to U.S. authorities.
He further reiterated that Ghana’s agreement with the U.S. remains limited and unchanged, and that no expansion to accommodate non-West African deportees—or persons with criminal allegations—had been negotiated or considered. He stated as follows:
In my interactions with U.S. officials, I made clear that our understanding to accept a limited number of non-criminal West Africans, purely on the grounds of African solidarity and humanitarian principles, would not be expanded. Ghana strongly objects to these misleading media reports.
Background: The Kilmar Abrego Garcia Case
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, second from right, seen leaving the Putnam County Jail, Tennessee, August 22, 2025. (Brett Carlsen/AP Photo)
Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s reported journey sheds light on the complexities and evolving nature of global migration and deportation cases. Originally from El Salvador, Abrego Garcia was living in Maryland in the U.S. with his wife and children before a series of legal battles made his case headline news. His situation highlights the intersection of immigration law, international relations, and human rights, with particular relevance for West African nations and the global community.
In March 2025, despite a 2019 court order reportedly barring his removal due to threats of persecution, American authorities deported Abrego Garcia to El Salvador’s high-security CECOT prison. The U.S. government, under the Trump administration, accused him of membership in the notorious MS-13 gang—allegations that his family and legal representatives have strongly denied over the years. According to several advocacy organizations and local news outlets, there was significant concern among legal experts in both El Salvador and the U.S. regarding his risk of encountering violence if returned home.
After just a few months in El Salvador, U.S. authorities brought Abrego Garcia back to the United States in June 2025. This time, he faced new human smuggling charges in Tennessee. Pleading not guilty, he was released into his brother’s care in Maryland as he awaited trial, highlighting the ongoing legal challenges for many migrants in similar situations.
Subsequent twists in his case saw immigration officials detain him again and, according to DHS correspondence, consider deportation to a shortlist of countries that included Eswatini, Uganda, and, for a brief period, Ghana. However, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security later clarified that the notice relating to Ghana had been issued prematurely, instructing attorneys to disregard it completely.
Ghana’s decisive response, as voiced by Minister Ablakwa, dispelled any remaining uncertainty about the country’s stance and offered broader lessons on how West African states are navigating complex diplomatic issues tied to international migration. His message reinforced Ghana’s commitment to due process, the rule of law, and clear communication with international partners.
Insights for Nigeria, West Africa, and Beyond: Lessons and Challenges
This case holds significant implications for Nigeria and other African countries that face regular diplomatic pressure regarding the acceptance of deportees or international migrants. According to Lagos-based migration law analyst Tunde Oladipo, “Cases like Abrego Garcia’s underline the importance of bilateral clarity—African countries must ensure their agreements protect humanitarian interests without exposing them to irregular or unfair deportation requests.”
Historically, various African nations have faced similar dilemmas. As the International Organization for Migration (IOM) notes, West Africa sees thousands of deportees returned annually—often without proper documentation or community reintegration, straining social services and raising human rights concerns. For Nigeria, where an estimated 1.3 million citizens live abroad (according to World Bank data), deportation protocols must balance national interests with diaspora welfare and global responsibilities.
Civil society groups in Ghana and Nigeria are increasingly vocal about the need for transparent vetting, non-discrimination, and reintegration planning for returnees. As a representative of the Ghana Center for Migration Studies recently put it, “Governments must ensure any agreements are public, limited in scope, and respect the dignity of all involved.”
Comparative Data and Wider Regional Impact
- Only a small fraction of African deportees from the U.S. ultimately return to countries other than their own, according to IOM data.
- Cases involving alleged gang affiliation (such as MS-13) often lead to intense scrutiny and legal battles—for both deportees and host countries.
- Nigeria, Ghana, and the broader ECOWAS region have all called for better international cooperation on migration and mutually respectful agreements.
Meanwhile, observers note that global attention on cases like Abrego Garcia’s highlight both the vulnerabilities of migrants and the responsibility states hold in upholding legal standards. According to Abuja-based policy consultant Chinenye Nwankwo, “It’s critical for African nations to assert their sovereignty and protect the rights of their citizens, but also to cooperate on humanitarian grounds when appropriate.”
Local Voices and Expert Perspectives
Speaking with community leaders in Accra and Lagos, many echoed a sense of relief that Ghana upheld its stated protocols. “We must ensure that migration partnerships with the West do not compromise our national identity or create additional burdens for people at home,” commented Ghanaian activist Mary Mensah.
Reflecting broader West African sentiment, a Nigerian official at the National Commission for Refugees, Migrants and Internally Displaced Persons emphasized, “Nigeria, like Ghana, must regularly review its agreements with global partners to avoid undue strain on our systems and ensure ethical standards are maintained.”
Conclusion: What Comes Next?
The Kilmar Abrego Garcia saga is a multifaceted reminder of why clear bilateral agreements and legal frameworks matter—both for protecting individuals and sustaining national interest. Ghana’s stance sets a notable precedent for West African countries navigating the rapidly changing landscape of global migration. As the region sees more of its people traveling, working, or seeking asylum abroad, the challenge of upholding the dignity and rights of all parties remains.
For Nigerians, Ghanaians, and the wider African diaspora, the story is also a call for vigilance, transparency, and advocacy in all matters of international migration.
What are your thoughts on how West African nations should handle international deportation requests? Do you think Ghana’s decision will influence how Nigeria or ECOWAS countries manage migration issues in the future? Share your view in the comments below and follow us for the latest in African and global news!
Have a story, opinion, or tip to share? Looking to get your perspective featured or sell a story? We want to hear from you! Email us at
story@nowahalazone.com to get started.
For general support, kindly reach out to support@nowahalazone.com.
Stay connected—follow us on
Facebook,
X (Twitter), and
Instagram
for breaking news, updates, and community voices from across Africa!
